Comparison according to the generation method of thermal plasma
Type of plasma generation | Advantages | Weakness |
---|---|---|
DC thermal plasma (non-transferred type) | Easy operating | |
High thermal efficiency (> 60%) | Contamination from electrode erosion | |
Low flow rate of plasma forming gas | Limitation of plasma forming gas composition (no oxidizing gas) | |
Low cost processing | ||
Compact system | Limitation of electrode lifetime | |
Atmospheric pressure discharge | ||
DC thermal plasma (transferred type) | Effective heat transfer by using high enthalpy arc | |
High thermal efficiency (> 60%) | ||
Low flow rate of plasma forming gas | Requirement of electric conductive target material as anode | |
Low cost processing | Difficult to enhance uniform heat transfer inside of crucible | |
Compact system | ||
Atmospheric pressure discharge | ||
RF thermal plasma (Inductively coupled plasma) | No contamination by electrode material and arc gas | Sensitive matching system for discharging |
Relatively low thermal efficiency (< 60%) | High flow rate of plasma forming gas | |
Discharge under low pressure (vacuum system) | Relatively high cost processing |
© The Korean Vacuum Society. All Rights Reserved. / Powered by INFOrang Co., Ltd